The monarch remains committed to his constitutional role despite tension with Prince Harry
King Charles is reportedly keeping his attention on his royal responsibilities as family disputes and public scandals continue to unfold, particularly those involving his son, Prince Harry. Despite growing pressure, the King appears determined not to let personal issues disrupt his role as head of state.
According to royal author and Telegraph correspondent Valentine Low, Charles has remained true to his long-standing pledge not to be a “meddling monarch,” distancing himself from the reputation he once had as a “meddling prince.” “He no longer writes to ministers or gives provocative speeches of the sort that used to anger them,” Low explained. “He’s doing his best to be a constitutional king.”
Tradition dictates that the monarch must stay neutral and avoid taking political positions. While Charles was known for his outspoken views during his time as Prince of Wales, he has since adopted a far more measured tone. “In the first four days after his accession, he gave three speeches, and all of them mentioned the constitution,” Low noted, suggesting a deliberate effort to demonstrate restraint.
That commitment was tested when Charles was asked to host former U.S. President Donald Trump for a second state visit — a decision that carried diplomatic sensitivities. Still, the King agreed without hesitation. “If that’s what the Government wants, he’s jolly well going to be accommodating,” Low said.
A Palace insider added that the King is conscious of “demonstrating support for his government,” reinforcing his intent to prioritise duty over personal matters.
This approach may also explain his silence regarding Harry’s recent comments about the Palace courtiers — the so-called “men in grey suits” — and the Duke’s legal battles with the Home Office. Although the King reportedly wishes to rebuild his relationship with his “darling boy,” he has chosen not to intervene publicly, mindful of his constitutional obligations.
As Harry continues to express frustration toward the Palace, it remains uncertain how Charles will balance his desire for reconciliation with his responsibility to uphold the stability and neutrality of the Crown.
